How to Get Focus Groups Talking: New Ideas that will Stick
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
From ideas to studies: how to get ideas and sharpen them into research questions
Where do new research questions come from? This is at best only partially taught in courses or textbooks about clinical or epidemiological research. Methods are taught under the assumption that a researcher already knows the research question and knows which methods will fit that question. Similarly, the real complexity of the thought processes that lead to a scientific undertaking is almost ne...
متن کاملHow to Write a Prize-Winning Abstract (That Will Get You Accepted as a Speaker!)
s presented under the first option should contain concise statements of: Background: the study objectives, the hypothesis to be tested, or a description of the problem Why do we do our work? What is/are the specific problem(s) that motivated us? Methods: method (s) used or approach taken Who did what, when, with how many, where? How did we do it? What was our methodology? How did we solve the p...
متن کاملBook Review: Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded
This is the premise which the author, an environmental scientist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, carries throughout the book. It is an alarming notion for some, acceptable to others, but nonetheless fresh and thought provoking to most. As scientists, we often delegate the actual writing process to a secondary role in the process of scientific investigation and reporting. But as ...
متن کاملHow hot will it get? Modeling scientific discourse about literature
Many metrics exist to provide heuristics for quality of scientific literature, some of which are determined before publication, such as impact factor of journal, or a liations of authors. Others, like citation count, are not. None of these metrics take into account the amount of scientific discourse generated by an article. I aim to create a classifier that does. In particular, in the wake of t...
متن کاملHow to get into that "room at the bottom".
“There’s plenty of room at the bottom,” as Richard Feynman famously formulated it in 1959 (1). He considered the problem of manipulating and controlling things “at the bottom” of the length scale, from Ångströms to micrometers. The fame came retroactively with the rise of nanotechnology (2). By then, the advantage of studying small objects in small laboratories was clear: in a microscopic labor...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Qualitative Methods
سال: 2007
ISSN: 1609-4069,1609-4069
DOI: 10.1177/160940690700600303